The archetypes of literature frye pdf

Each category is further subdivided into two categories: The contribution of a literary anthropologist to norhtrop criticism is no small. Frye further says that, almost all genres in every literature have been evolved from the quest-myth only. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.

These cookies do not store any personal information. Skip to content. Search for:. The major. Northrop Frye. The Kenyon Review, Vol. Primordial images originate from the initial stages of humanity and have been part of the collective unconscious ever since.

Both pattern and rhythm are the major basic components of a work. An Epistle to Dr. Give examples of the outcome of deductive method. Frye outlines five different spheres in his schema: Phallic symbols towers, mountain peaks, snakes, knives, swords, etc.

Cities, temples, precious stones, etc. She was renowned for her knowledge of drugs and herbs. It was not until the work of the Canadian literary critic Northrop ,iterature that archetypal criticism was theorized in purely literary terms. Literature and the Possibilities of Language Function. The variety of human activities and needs gives rise to a plurality of language functions, among them communication.

However, communication is so highly rated that for many this is not merely a … Expand. Myths reflect the collective experience of mankind. Certain things recur in world myths. View 1 excerpt, cites background. Here I will make a deconstructive reading and show how the image of sea as archetype misses its centre implying meanings … Expand. An archetype is generally defined as "a universal symbol that cuts across geographical, cultural and chronological boundaries to present a human experience that evokes a similar response regardless … Expand.

Related Papers. Abstract 37 Citations Related Papers. The third part focuses on the deductive method of analysis. All the methods fall under structural criticism.

Literature can be interpreted in as many ways as possible, and there are different approaches to literature, and one among them is the archetypal approach. Archetypal approach is the interpretation of a text in northro light of cultural patterns involved in it, and these cultural patterns are based on the myths and rituals of a race or nation or social group.

Myths and rituals are explored in a text for discovery of meaning and message. In recent times this type of critics. James George Frazer and Carl Gustav Jung are the two great arhcetypes who, have greatly contributed to the development of archetypal approach. Frazer was a social anthropologist and his book The Golden Bough makes a study of magic, religion fre myths of different races. Jung was a psychologist associated with Freud.

Eliot has used mythical patterns in his creative works and The Waste Land is a good example of it. Northrop Frye in his essay does not analyze any particular myth in a work and in.

Two Types of Criticism and the Humanities. Like science, literary criticism is also a systematized and organized body of knowledge. Science dissects and analyses nature and facts. Similarly literary criticism analyses and interprets literature. Frye further says that literacy criticism and its theories and techniques can be taught, but literature cannot be taught, rather it is to be felt and enjoyed.

Indeed, literary criticism is like science and it can be creative. There are two types of literary criticism: A meaningless criticism will not help a reader in developing a systematic structure of knowledge about a work of literature.

This kind of criticism will give only the background information about a work. A meaningless criticism will distract the reader from literature. Literature is a part of humanities and humanities include philosophy and history also.

These two branches of knowledge provide a kind of pattern for understanding literature. Philosophy and history are two major tools- for interpretation of literature and archetypal criticism is based on philosophy and history of a people.

Archetypal criticism is meaningful criticism. There are different types of criticism and most of them remain commentaries on texts. There is a type of criticism, which focuses only on an analysis of a text. Such a criticism confines itself to the text and does not give any other background information about the text.